On 10th April 2023, the Supreme Court of India pronounced its judgment in the case of NTPC Ltd. vs M/s SPML Infra Ltd.
1. The judgment of Hind Offshore Pvt. Ltd. v. IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 966 breaks new ground on issues surrounding
In a recent case before the Bombay High Court, a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court has upheld the arrest of an inland vessel which was plying in the non-inland waters.
The recent judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of Vatsala Jagannathan v. Tristar Accommodations Ltd, 2023 SCC OnLine Mad 308 (“Vatsala Judgment”),
There may be situations in a dispute wherein the litigant may face the conundrum as to whether
1. The Appeal Court/ Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in the case of Angsley Investments Ltd.
A CASE STUDY OF OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. POLARIS GALAXY V BANQUE CANTONALE DE GENEVE.
Lately, there has been considerable jurisprudence of what constitutes "Sheriff's expenses" in an action involving the arrest of a Vessel. In this article, the authors shall endeavour to focus on . . .
The contested interplay between the process of dispute resolution and an unstamped or insufficiently stamped instrument was long under judicial scrutiny until it was recently decided by the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court of Indiain the case of N.N. Global Mercantile (P) Ltd.
The Supreme Court of India in its judgment in PASL Wind Solutions Private Limited v. GE Power Conversion India Private Limited (Civil Appeal No. 1647 of 2021, judgment dated 20 April 2021)
The Corporate Debtor availed loan facilities from various financial creditors and defaulted in re-payments leading to his account being declared as a non- performing asset.
Article by Aditya Krishnamurthy, Partner, Bose & Mitra & Co., given for publication by the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (SCMA)
On 5th August 2020, the Supreme Court of India pronounced judgement in the case of The Chairman, Board of Trustees, Cochin v. M/s Arebee Star Maritime Agencies Private Ltd. & Ors., 2020 SCC OnLine SC 622 (“Arebee”), thereby holding that Ports could not fasten the liability for payment of port storage/ demurrage charges for uncleared cargo/containers lying in port premises upon the ship-owners/ vessel agents/steamer agents after the Port had taken charge of the goods and given a receipt for the same.
